Different working paces: how can colleagues deliver together?
Start with each person's working conditions, then turn differences in pace into clear deliverables, checkpoints, and agreements.
Read Article →Understand constraints, risks, and resources before offering a solution. Turn listening into clearer decisions and practical support.
Career and WorkA team member says, ‘This deadline is difficult,’ and you immediately explain how to work faster. But they may need to clarify whether requirements have expanded, when data will arrive from another department, or which quality expectations can be reduced for now. A leader who responds only to speed may leave the actual constraint untouched.
Ask one more question: ‘Which part is most affecting delivery right now?’ Let the person describe the situation. Listening does not mean handing away every decision. It means giving your judgment enough information from the work itself.
First confirm the shared goal—for example, delivering a usable version on time rather than every originally imagined feature. Then establish whether the obstacle involves information, skills, resources, or conflicting priorities. Finally, ask the team member to suggest at least one workable option, including the support it needs and the cost involved.
Avoid asking only, ‘Any problems?’ The person may not know which issues they are allowed to bring up. Narrow the question to actual progress: ‘Which unconfirmed requirement is most likely to cause rework?’ This is more likely to produce an answer you can use to make a decision.
A designer misses delivery deadlines for two consecutive weeks. The manager plans to require daily progress reports. After asking more questions, the manager discovers that three different contacts are requesting revisions directly. The designer does not know whose feedback takes priority and is reluctant to cancel changes already promised.
The manager assigns one contact to consolidate requests, requires new work to be checked for its effect on deadlines, and asks the designer to report unresolved items weekly. Not every delay comes from a process problem. In this case, however, merely increasing the frequency of updates would spend time proving busyness without removing the real obstacle.
Listening without a response can make team members feel the problem was merely recorded. Summarize who will do what and when it will be reviewed. If a decision must wait, explain what information is still missing and when you expect to answer. If you cannot offer the requested support, explain why and discuss alternatives.
Once a decision is made, share the considerations and priorities behind it. Different views cannot always be adopted, but they can be understood and addressed. Leaders also need to own trade-offs rather than saying ‘Work it out among yourselves’ and leaving team members with a conflict that requires a manager's decision.
The value of one more question is a clearer next step that reflects what is actually happening in the work.
Listening does not require unanimous agreement on every decision. Clarify at the beginning whether you are gathering views, deciding together, or checking implementation after a decision has been made. Defining the discussion helps people understand how their input will be used.
Do not assume silence means a lack of ideas. Some people need to organize their thoughts in writing or find it hard to enter a group discussion. Share the topic in advance and allow follow-up afterward, but avoid assigning an unrequested special approach based only on a personality assumption.
The next time someone describes a difficulty, restate the obstacle in your own words and confirm your understanding before offering advice. Leave two minutes at the end of the meeting to confirm pending decisions and who owns them. A week later, check whether the issue has moved forward, rather than only whether people spoke more in the meeting. The quality of leadership ultimately needs to show in support and delivery.
This everyday-life article is written by the Personality 14 Editorial Team. The people and situations are illustrative examples; compare them with your own experience as you read.